Title: Phi 2 vs Phi Tiny MoE Instruct: Parametre, Licens %E2%80%94 LLM EU Canonical: https://llmeu.com/da/compare/phi-2-vs-phi-tiny-moe-instruct/ Markdown mirror: https://llmeu.com/da/compare/phi-2-vs-phi-tiny-moe-instruct.md Machine-readable: https://llmeu.com/llms.txt (index) - https://llmeu.com/llms-full.txt (full catalogue) - https://llmeu.com/llms-catalogue.json # Phi 2 vs Phi Tiny MoE Instruct S%C3%A6t to til fire modeller side om side p%C3%A5 de felter, der afg%C3%B8r en udrulning: kontekst, pris, region, licens, sprog, hosting og hvad der er verificeret. Hvor to modeller adskiller sig, viser denne tabel forskellen og stopper. LLM EU offentligg%C3%B8r ikke et vinderbadge uden en dokumenteret score for den opgave, og et manglende tal forbliver manglende i stedet for at blive et nul. ## Hvorn%C3%A5r man bruger den ### [Phi 2](/da/models/phi-2/) #### Styrker - open weights are published on Hugging Face and can be downloaded without a vendor agreement - mit licence, so commercial self-hosting is permitted without a separate agreement - at 2.8B parameters it fits on a single accelerator - the model page lists en #### Begr%C3%A6nsninger - catalogue only %E2%80%94 LLM EU does not run this model, and nothing on this card implies an LLM EU endpoint - no evaluation has been run by LLM EU - the published configuration records no context window, so the card carries none - at 2.8B parameters, the weights fit on a single modest accelerator #### Opgaver [R%C3%A6sonnement](/da/tasks/reasoning/), [Lav pris](/da/tasks/cheap/) ### [Phi Tiny MoE Instruct](/da/models/phi-tiny-moe-instruct/) #### Styrker - open weights are published on Hugging Face and can be downloaded without a vendor agreement - mit licence, so commercial self-hosting is permitted without a separate agreement - at 3.8B parameters it fits on a single accelerator - the model page lists en - instruction-tuned checkpoint with a chat template in the repository #### Begr%C3%A6nsninger - catalogue only %E2%80%94 LLM EU does not run this model, and nothing on this card implies an LLM EU endpoint - no evaluation has been run by LLM EU - the published configuration records no context window, so the card carries none - at 3.8B parameters, the weights fit on a single modest accelerator #### Opgaver [R%C3%A6sonnement](/da/tasks/reasoning/), [Lav pris](/da/tasks/cheap/) **Opgaver:** [R%C3%A6sonnement](/da/tasks/reasoning/), [Lav pris](/da/tasks/cheap/) ## Sammenlign modeller - [Blip2 Opt 2.7B vs Phi 2](/da/compare/blip2-opt-2-7b-vs-phi-2/) - [NVIDIA Cosmos Reason2 2B vs Phi 2](/da/compare/cosmos-reason2-2b-vs-phi-2/) - [Deepseek Coder 7B Instruct V1.5 vs Phi Tiny MoE Instruct](/da/compare/deepseek-coder-7b-instruct-v1-5-vs-phi-tiny-moe-instruct/) - [DeepSeek OCR vs Phi 2](/da/compare/deepseek-ocr-vs-phi-2/) - [DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Phi 2](/da/compare/deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-1-5b-vs-phi-2/) - [DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B vs Phi Tiny MoE Instruct](/da/compare/deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-7b-vs-phi-tiny-moe-instruct/)