EuroLLM-9B-Instruct (2512)

EuroLLM (utter-project) · Leverantörer EU

Inte hostad – mock-backend Öppna vikter Europeisk leverantör

Suveränitet och hosting

Inte hostad – mock-backend

Inte hostad på LLM EU i den här distributionen: begäranden besvaras av den inbyggda mock-backenden i regionen dev-mock. Inga vikter körs.

Sammanfattning

EuroLLM-9B-Instruct (2512) is the long-context revision of the EuroLLM 9B instruct model, trained for the 24 official EU languages plus Catalan, Galician, Turkish, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Russian and Hindi. It is published under Apache-2.0 with a 32k-token context window and a revised post-training recipe taken from the 22B release. It is designed for European language coverage, not for frontier reasoning.

Specifikationer

Leverantör
EuroLLM (utter-project) (PT)
Kontextfönster
33k
Parametrar
9.15B
Modaliteter
text
Licens
apache-2.0 · licence
Öppna vikter
yes
Utgivningsdatum
26 jan. 2026
Uppgifter
translation, multilingual-support, summarization, rag

Språk

Stark: en, de, es, fr, it, pt, pl, nl, sv, cs, el, ro, fi, da, uk

Tillräcklig: hu, bg, sk, sl, lt, lv, et, hr, ga, mt, ca, tr, ar, zh, ja, ko, ru, hi

Språk

Stark

  • en
  • de
  • es
  • fr
  • it
  • pt
  • pl
  • nl
  • sv
  • cs
  • el
  • ro
  • fi
  • da
  • uk

Tillräcklig

  • hu
  • bg
  • sk
  • sl
  • lt
  • lv
  • et
  • hr
  • ga
  • mt
  • ca
  • tr
  • ar
  • zh
  • ja
  • ko
  • ru
  • hi

Inte verifierad: leverantören har inte dokumenterat detta påstående. — a language is listed as strong only where a source claims it; the card links the evidence where one exists.

När den ska användas

Styrkor

  • explicit coverage of the 24 official EU languages
  • Apache-2.0 licence with no user threshold
  • runs on a single mid-range accelerator
  • long-context extension phase applied in training

Begränsningar

  • 32k-token context window is small next to current long-context models
  • reasoning and coding quality below same-size commercial models
  • the project publishes no independent third-party evaluation