EuroLLM-9B-Instruct (2512)

EuroLLM (utter-project) · Fornecedores EU

Não hospedado — backend mock Pesos abertos Fornecedor europeu

Soberania e alojamento

Não hospedado — backend mock

Não hospedado na LLM EU nesta implementação: os pedidos são respondidos pelo backend mock incorporado na região dev-mock. Nenhuns pesos são executados.

Resumo

EuroLLM-9B-Instruct (2512) is the long-context revision of the EuroLLM 9B instruct model, trained for the 24 official EU languages plus Catalan, Galician, Turkish, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Russian and Hindi. It is published under Apache-2.0 with a 32k-token context window and a revised post-training recipe taken from the 22B release. It is designed for European language coverage, not for frontier reasoning.

Especificações

Fornecedor
EuroLLM (utter-project) (PT)
Janela de contexto
33k
Parâmetros
9.15B
Modalidades
text
Licença
apache-2.0 · licence
Pesos abertos
yes
Data de lançamento
26/01/2026
Tarefas
translation, multilingual-support, summarization, rag

Idiomas

Forte: en, de, es, fr, it, pt, pl, nl, sv, cs, el, ro, fi, da, uk

Adequado: hu, bg, sk, sl, lt, lv, et, hr, ga, mt, ca, tr, ar, zh, ja, ko, ru, hi

Idiomas

Forte

  • en
  • de
  • es
  • fr
  • it
  • pt
  • pl
  • nl
  • sv
  • cs
  • el
  • ro
  • fi
  • da
  • uk

Adequado

  • hu
  • bg
  • sk
  • sl
  • lt
  • lv
  • et
  • hr
  • ga
  • mt
  • ca
  • tr
  • ar
  • zh
  • ja
  • ko
  • ru
  • hi

Não verificado: o fornecedor não documentou esta afirmação. — a language is listed as strong only where a source claims it; the card links the evidence where one exists.

Quando utilizá-lo

Pontos fortes

  • explicit coverage of the 24 official EU languages
  • Apache-2.0 licence with no user threshold
  • runs on a single mid-range accelerator
  • long-context extension phase applied in training

Limitações

  • 32k-token context window is small next to current long-context models
  • reasoning and coding quality below same-size commercial models
  • the project publishes no independent third-party evaluation